test-run

v1 · generated 2026-07-22T12:39:57.705662+00:00 · sources: 8 ·
versions: v1 (this) · v2

Meta-prompt quality — ship (4.4/5)

dimensionscorereason
goal_fidelity5The meta-prompt strictly adheres to the GOAL of 'testing' and does not drift into unrelated tasks. It focuses on identifying testing-related repositories from the provided data and structuring the output accordingly.
capability_fit4The meta-prompt includes clear instructions for analyzing the data, identifying relevant repositories, and structuring the output. It grounds the task in the provided search hits and scraped content, avoiding gratuitous filler. However, it could explicitly mention handling cases where no repositories meet the criteria (though this is implied).
reasoning_transparency5The meta-prompt justifies inclusions/exclusions (e.g., criteria for testing relevance) and defines success criteria clearly. It also requires self-scoring with confidence values and grounded explanations, enhancing transparency.
actionability4The meta-prompt provides a concrete, executable plan with step-by-step instructions (analyze, identify, extract, note exclusions). The output schema is well-defined, and the constraints (e.g., 'test' validation) are actionable. However, it assumes scraped content is available for all repos, which may not be true in practice.
ambiguity_handling5The meta-prompt surfaces potential ambiguities (e.g., incomplete scraped data) and requires explicit notes about data limitations. It avoids guessing by grounding all output in provided data and requiring confidence scores for edge cases.

Output quality — ship (5.0/5)

dimensionscorereason
format_compliance5The OUTPUT strictly adheres to the required JSON schema, including all specified fields for repositories (name, url, description, metrics, relevance_to_testing, confidence, why_included) and excluded_repositories (name, url, reason_for_exclusion, confidence, why_included). Additional fields like validation and metadata are also correctly formatted.
accuracy5Claims in the OUTPUT are well-supported by the SOURCE DATA. Descriptions for 'oven-sh/bun' and 'microsoft/playwright' match the scraped content. 'cypress-io/cypress' is correctly identified as a testing tool based on common knowledge, though no scraped data was available. Excluded repositories are accurately justified. No fabrications are present.
self_score_calibration5Confidence scores are reasonable and vary appropriately. High confidence (1.0) is assigned where scraped data confirms testing relevance (e.g., 'oven-sh/bun', 'microsoft/playwright'). Lower confidence (0.9 or 0.5) is used where data is missing or reliance on common knowledge is required (e.g., 'cypress-io/cypress', 'aaif-goose/goose').
completeness5The OUTPUT includes all repositories from the SOURCE DATA, categorizing them as relevant or excluded with clear reasoning. Metrics are provided where available, and missing data is explicitly noted. The validation and metadata sections add context without omitting required fields.
usefulness5The OUTPUT is highly actionable. It clearly identifies testing-relevant repositories, provides metrics for comparison, and explains exclusions. The inclusion of confidence scores and reasoning aids decision-making. Even with missing data, the output remains useful by transparently noting gaps.
jump: task · validation · repositories · excluded repositories

task

testing

validation

hard_constraint_test
verified - the output contains 'test' in descriptions and relevance fields (e.g., 'test runner', 'testing framework', 'Web Testing')
data_completeness_note
Scraped data was only available for oven-sh/bun and microsoft/playwright; other repositories rely on titles and common knowledge, with no metrics for cypress-io/cypress and no data for aaif-goose/goose

repositories (3)

nameurlmetricsconfidence
oven-sh/bunlink↗stars: 94.9k; forks: 4.9k; commits: 16,4751.0
description
Incredibly fast JavaScript runtime, bundler, test runner, and package manager – all in one
relevance_to_testing
Includes a test runner as part of its all-in-one toolchain
why_included
Description explicitly mentions 'test runner'
microsoft/playwrightlink↗stars: 93.3k; forks: 6.1k; commits: 17,5531.0
description
Playwright is a framework for Web Testing and Automation. It allows testing Chromium, Firefox and WebKit with a single API.
relevance_to_testing
Dedicated web testing and automation framework supporting multiple browsers
why_included
Description explicitly states it is for 'Web Testing and Automation'
cypress-io/cypresslink↗stars: None; forks: None; commits: None0.9
description
No scraped data available; known as a front-end testing framework
relevance_to_testing
Cypress is a widely known end-to-end testing framework for web applications
why_included
Repository name and common knowledge indicate it is a testing framework, though no scraped data confirms

excluded repositories (5)

nameconfidence
storybookjs/storybook0.9
url
https://github.com/storybookjs/storybook
reason_for_exclusion
Focused on UI component development and documentation, not testing
why_included
Description not provided; known as a frontend workshop tool, not primarily testing
typicode/json-server0.9
url
https://github.com/typicode/json-server
reason_for_exclusion
Tool for creating fake REST APIs, not related to testing
why_included
Description not provided; known as a mock server, not testing
localstack/localstack0.9
url
https://github.com/localstack/localstack
reason_for_exclusion
Local cloud emulation for AWS services, not testing
why_included
Description not provided; known as a cloud emulator, not testing
h5bp/Front-end-Developer-Interview-Questions0.9
url
https://github.com/h5bp/Front-end-Developer-Interview-Questions
reason_for_exclusion
List of interview questions, not testing software
why_included
Title explicitly states 'Interview Questions'
aaif-goose/goose0.5
url
https://github.com/aaif-goose/goose
reason_for_exclusion
No scraped data; not a known testing tool
why_included
No data available to indicate testing relevance